Gay men are also told they need to overcome their genital preferences and accept females who believe themselves to be men as dating partners. Real lesbians (the female ones) are told their “genital preferences” are transphobic bigotry, and they’ll even be banned from lesbian dating apps if they have the audacity to specify females only in their profiles. The old I’m-a-lesbian-trapped-in-a-man’s-body joke has been brought to life in the form of the stunning and brave male lesbian. Because if a heterosexual man who identifies as a woman is a literal woman, then it follows that because he is attracted to women, he is also a lesbian – fully intact male anatomy notwithstanding. This gives us the most ludicrous concept of all: the male lesbian. The modern trans rights movement has redefined homosexuality from same-sex attraction to same-gender attraction. The trans rights movement is doing just that.įor many Canadians though, the most difficult aspect of all this to grasp is how the Pride flag could have become a symbol of homophobia. One could argue that gay men are more at risk in men’s prisons, and would actually be safer housed with women, but here’s the thing: the gay rights movement didn’t use women as shields to protect males from male violence. Or if they’d demanded that gay men be transferred to women’s prisons. If gay rights activists had campaigned to shut down women’s rape crisis shelters for the crime of not allowing gay men entry to them.
#Why is the gay pride symbol a rainbow full#
Imagine if gay rights had insisted that gay men be given full access to women’s spaces. Pointing out that single-sex spaces exist because males commit almost all sex offences and women make up almost all of their victims, thereby making female-only spaces a necessity not a privilege, will also result in accusations of transphobia. You must accept that a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman, and if you dare point out that such a definition is empty circular gibberish, you’ll be immediately accused of transphobia.Īlso in the name of trans rights, women are expected to give up the safety and protection of female-only spaces, and they are expected to do so gladly, without complaint.
You must be willing to accept that the definitions of man and woman are no longer grounded in material reality.
The modern trans rights movement makes demands that gay rights simply never did.įirst and foremost, in order to support trans rights, you must be willing to sacrifice truth. On the surface, the two movements appear very similar – there are the rainbow flags, the pleasant-sounding slogans, and heart-wrenching stories about violence and bullying.īut there are some crucial differences. It is understandable why they would think that. Most people in Canada support trans rights because they think it’s the next gay rights – a movement fighting for equality and seeking to improve the lives of a vulnerable oppressed group. We ought to be ashamed that it is flying on Parliament Hill.īut the average Canadian doesn’t understand any of that. In fact, it represents misogyny, homophobia, and the medical abuse of mostly gay, lesbian, and autistic teenagers.įurthermore, it is the symbol of a movement that has launched an all-out authoritarian attack on our freedom of thought, belief, and expression.
The one Trudeau raised, the Progress Pride flag, with its chevron combining the colors of trans rights inexplicably with black and brown, represents no such thing. A flag that truly did represent tolerance and inclusivity. The simple rainbow of the gay rights movement. He appears to be talking about a different flag – the original Pride flag.